NASA’s risk classification system dates back to an era when every new NASA space mission was a one-of-a-kind build, and the only way to obtain reliability was as a by-product through a combination of reliability analyses, extensive and stringent quality requirements, and extensive testing. Originally, there were very limited commercial capabilities to develop systems to work reliably in space, so NASA considered its own homegrown approach the only recipe for success. This approach involved very detailed and prescriptive piece-part controls and no reliance on (and to some extent a rejection of) any type of commercial practices. Often risk was considered to be the lowest when NASA had the maximum amount of control and prescription, and the highest when commercial practices were largely employed, and these principles drove risk classification in the agency. Over time, however, commercial capabilities grew, and many products became standardized and commercialized, while the agency maintained its tried-and-true approach, paying little attention to the evolution of the commercial sector. This presentation introduces GSFC’s new approach at risk classification, which includes classification of components and full spacecraft, as well as of constellations of spacecraft.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Risk Classification Modernization


    Contributors:

    Conference:

    Adapting Mission Assurance mini-conference ; 2022 ; Albuquerque, NM, US


    Type of media :

    Miscellaneous


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    Risk Classification Modernization

    J. Leitner | NTIS | 2023



    GMDSS Modernization

    Markle, B. | TIBKAT | 2018


    Shipyard modernization

    Engineering Index Backfile | 1949


    GLONASS Modernization

    Urlichich, Y. / Subbotin, V. / Stupak, G. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011