The Appropriations Bill passed by the US Congress in February 2019 instructed NASA to direct “not less than $100,000,000 for the development of nuclear thermal propulsion, of which not less than $70,000,000 shall be for the design of a flight demonstration by 2024 for which a multi-year plan is required by both the House and the Senate within 180 days of enactment of this agreement." As part of NASA’s response to this direction, the Advanced Concepts Office (ACO) at the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) was tasked with leading a study to develop a nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) flight demonstration (FD) concept and evaluate its feasibility with respect to the near-term schedule goal. During formulation for the NTP FD study, two perspectives emerged with regards to FD concept design. The first seeks to strictly observe the immediate near-term schedule goal, embracing a completely “off-the-shelf,” high-TRL approach to subsystem design and component selection. The downside to this approach is that the propulsion performance to be expected from such a design is significantly lower than what NTP promises for operational systems, and the value of the flight demo is potentially reduced due to a lack of traceability. The second approach advocates for an FD concept that shows increased traceability to the projected designs of operational systems, providing risk reduction for future NTP-enabled missions. This option comes at the cost of schedule and development risks, as it requires some new investments in nuclear reactor fuels and design. In order to understand the implications and differences between these two approaches, the ACO team elected to perform a concept design of each type, labeling the immediate near-term concept Flight Demo 1 (FD1), and the higher traceability concept Flight Demo 2 (FD2). This paper will present a summary of the mission profiles and system designs for both FD1 and FD2, identifying key drivers and challenges for each design.
Near-Term Options for a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Flight Demonstrator
Programmatic and Industrial Base (PIB)
;
2019
;
Tampa, FL, United States
Joint Subcommittee Meeting
;
2019
;
Tampa, FL, United States
Liquid Propulsion (LPS)
;
2019
;
Tampa, FL, United States
Modeling & Simulation (MSS)
;
2019
;
Tampa, FL, United States
Spacecraft Propulsion (SPS)
;
2019
;
Tampa, FL, United States
2019-12-09
Conference paper
No indication
English
Propulsion Technology Demonstrator
NTRS | 2015
|Near-term lunar nuclear thermal rocket engine options
AIAA | 1991
|