Conventional prompt global strike (CPGS) weapons would allow the United States to strike targets anywhere on Earth in as little as an hour. This capability may bolster U.S. efforts to deter and defeat adversaries by allowing the United States to attack high-value targets or fleeting targets at the start of or during a conflict. Congress has generally supported the PGS mission, but restricted funding for several years. Recently, efforts to develop a long-range prompt strike capability, along with other efforts to develop extremely fast hypersonic weapons, have garnered increased support. CPGS weapons would not substitute for nuclear weapons, but would supplement U.S. conventional capabilities. Officials have argued that the long-range systems would provide a niche capability, with a small number of weapons directed against select, critical targets. Some analysts, however, have raised concerns about the possibility that U.S. adversaries might misinterpret the launch of a missile with conventional warheads and conclude that the missiles carry nuclear weapons. The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is considering a number of systems that might provide the United States with long-range strike capabilities. This report will be updated as needed.
Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues
2019
52 pages
Report
No indication
English
Behavior & Society , Missile Technology , Prompt global strike , Ballistic missiles , Policies , Hypersonic weapons , Hypersonics , Russia , China , Congress , Military budgets , Department of defense , Missions , United states strategic command , Legislation , Risks , Threats , Cruise missiles , Targets , Falcon study , Cpgs (conventional pgs) , Pgs (prompt global strike) , Long-range ballistic missiles , Crs (congressional research service) , Crs report