The purpose of this study was to determine and examine alternative force structuring strategies for military satellite communication (MILSATCOM) systems. The study was undertaken due to the United States' reliance on relatively few, expensive satellites as critical communication links. Current anti-satellite weapons pose a definite threat to missions using this type of strategy. In response to this situation, proliferated MILSATCOM designs using low earth circular orbits and a highly elliptical (Molniya) orbit were defined and analyzed. The objective of this effort was to compare the proliferated alternative systems' performance and cost with a current MILSATCOM system. The Fleet Satellite Communication (FLTSATCOM) system was used as the baseline system for comparison. Overall, both alternative force structuring strategies provided superior earth coverage when subjected to satellite losses. This was especially evident in the European and Mideast theaters. The Molyniya constellation was the best alternative when considering system performance, system cost, current MILSATCOM system compatibility and the technology required for system implementation.
Alternative Force Structuring Strategies for Military Satellite Communication Systems
1987
102 pages
Report
No indication
English
Common Carrier & Satellite , Unmanned Spacecraft , Military Operations, Strategy, & Tactics , Antisatellite defense systems , Communications networks , Satellite communications , Artificial satellites , Base lines , Circular orbits , Communication satellites , Compatibility , Costs , Earth orbits , Earth(Planet) , Europe , Fleets(Ships) , Losses , Low orbit trajectories , Middle east , Military satellites , Strategy , Theater level operations , Threats , United states , Weapons , Theses
Overview: Military satellite communication systems
Tema Archive | 1976
|Structuring Bank Financing for Satellite Ventures
British Library Online Contents | 1998
|Structuring Bank Financing for Satellite Ventures
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
|