NASA at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and the U.S. Army at Redstone Arsenal were analyzed to determine whether they were successful in implementing their risk management program. Risk management implementation surveys were distributed to aid in this analysis. The scope is limited to NASA S&MA (Safety and Mission Assurance) at MSFC, including applicable support contractors, and the US Army Engineering Directorate, including applicable contractors, located at Redstone Arsenal. NASA has moderately higher risk management implementation survey scores than the Army. Accordingly, the implementation of the risk management program at NASA is considered good while only two of five of the survey categories indicated that the risk management implementation is good at the Army.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Engineering Management Capstone Project EM 697: Compare and Contrast Risk Management Implementation at NASA and the US Army


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    2002


    Size :

    30 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English