The two main sub-scale, ground-based rocket aerodynamics testing techniques – hot-fire testing and cold-flow testing – pose a series of tradeoffs. Hot-fire testing is generally much more accurate, but is often burdensome, costly, and requires long lead times due to design work, infrastructure preparation, etc. Cold-flow testing is much less expensive and has a rapid turnaround time, but conventional simulants (e.g., nitrogen, steam) used in cold-flow testing yield less accurate results (i.e., results that are not sufficiently representative of test article performance). While researching methods to optimize such tradeoffs, engineers at NASA’s Stennis Space Center discovered that ethane can be tuned to approximate rocket exhaust plumes generated by several common rocket propellants. This led NASA to develop the HYdrocarbon Propellants Enabling Reproduction of Flows in Rocket Engines (HYPERFIRE), a sub-scale, non-reacting flow test system. HYPERFIRE uses heated ethane to enable physical simulation of rocket engines powered by a broad range of propellants in an inexpensive, accurate, and simple fashion.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    HYPERFIRE


    Contributors:
    D. R. Jones (author)

    Publication date :

    2022


    Size :

    2 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English