The ethical treatment of human research subjects is a requirement of federal regulations. Accomplishing this goal requires that important bilateral information-sharing between research staff and subjects occurs at all phases of the research process, and that significant safeguards are provided to minimize the potential for injury. This report presents an overview of subject- and injury-management procedures utilized during an aeromedical research project designed to assess the effects of changes in airplane cabin configuration and operation on emergency evacuation through a Type-III overwing exit, as well as an analysis of the injuries sustained by subjects during the study. Subject management procedures included medical screening to assure a basic level of subject health and fitness, briefings applicable to important safety issues in the research process, alteration of the research method to eliminate identified sources of injury, and informed subject consent. All 2,544 subjects completed 4 evacuation trials for a total of 10,176 crossings through the Type-III exit. Fifty- eight (2.3%) of the subjects sustained some type of injury during the evacuations, for a rate of 0.0057 injuries per exit-crossing. Eleven of those injuries (18.6%) were deemed serious. Forty injuries (69.0%) were sustained during high-motivation trials. Differential subject management by flight attendants affected the occurrence of injury, necessitating procedural changes halfway through the study to reduce the injury rate. Injuries are an undesirable corollary to research involving humans. There is a significant potential for injuries in studies simulating emergency evacuation from airplanes in which subjects must navigate a chaotic aircraft cabin, compete for the available egress route, and maneuver through the exit to the outside. Experimental evacuations provide valuable information on injury patterns and prevention that can help airlines increase passenger safety. (4 tables, 21 figures)7.
Access-to-Egress II: Subject Management and Injuries in a Study of Emergency Evacuation through the Type-III Exit
2003
28 pages
Report
No indication
English
Air Transportation , Management Practice , Clinical Medicine , Public Health & Industrial Medicine , Job Environment , Humans , Research management , Medical research , Transport aircraft , Passengers , Evacuation , Simulation , Emergencies , Commercial aircraft , Flight crews , Safety , Wounds and injuries , Ethics , Aviation safety , Fixed wing aircraft , Exits , Hatches , Aircraft cabins , Risk analysis , Human research subjects , Aircraft evacuation , Evacuation research , Subject management , Subject injuries , Subject safety , Injury management , Simulated evacuations , Cabin configurations , Passageway configurations , Cabin safety , Emergency egress , Hatch operation , Competitive egress , Aircraft egress , Federal policy for the protection of human subjects , Injury analysis , Wing exits
Uncommon exit arrangement effects in airplane emergency evacuation
SAGE Publications | 2018
|Releasable seal assembly for emergency access and egress
European Patent Office | 2022
|