Graphical abstract

    HighlightsRapid-charging battery electric buses have the lowest ownership and external costs.Limited range remains a major practical challenge for battery electric buses.60-foot transit buses have higher ownership & external costs than 40-foot buses.Externality from greenhouse gases and air pollutants can and should be considered.Transit buses emit 1% of particular matter from mobile sources in Allegheny County.

    AbstractThis paper assesses alternative fuel options for transit buses. We consider the following options for a 40-foot and a 60-foot transit bus: a conventional bus powered by either diesel or a biodiesel blend (B20 or B100), a diesel hybrid-electric bus, a sparking-ignition bus powered by Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) or Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), and a battery electric bus (BEB) (rapid or slow charging). We estimate life cycle ownership costs (for buses and infrastructure) and environmental externalities caused by greenhouse gases (GHGs) and criteria air pollutants (CAPs) emitted from the life cycle of bus operations. We find that all alternative fuel options lead to higher life cycle ownership and external costs than conventional diesel. When external funding is available to pay for 80% of vehicle purchase expenditures (which is usually the case for U.S. transit agencies), BEBs yield large reductions (17–23%) in terms of ownership and external costs compared to diesel. Furthermore, BEBs’ advantages are robust to changes in operation and economic assumptions when external funding is available. BEBs are able to reduce CAP emissions significantly in Pittsburgh’s hotspot areas, where existing bus fleets contribute to 1% of particulate matter emissions from mobile sources. We recognize that there are still practical barriers for BEBs, e.g. range limits, land to build the charging infrastructure, and coordination with utilities. However, favorable trends such as better battery performance and economics, cleaner electricity grid, improved technology maturity, and accumulated operation experience may favor use of BEBs where feasible.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Life cycle ownership cost and environmental externality of alternative fuel options for transit buses


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2017-01-01


    Size :

    16 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English





    Environmental life-cycle assessment of transit buses with alternative fuel technology

    McKenzie, Elaine Croft / Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. | Elsevier | 2011


    Comprehensive Total Cost of Ownership Framework for Alternative Fuel Public Transportation Buses

    Khan, Mansoor J. A. / Onat, Nuri Cihat | Transportation Research Record | 2022


    Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans

    R. Laver / D. Schneck / D. Skorupski et al. | NTIS | 2007


    Diesels in transit buses

    Horine, Merrill C. | SAE Technical Papers | 1948