Highlights Identify and mitigate the risk of crash prone intersections with connected vehicles and deep-learning. CVs achieved rapid data collection even under a low market penetration rate of CVs. Deep-learning models trained with preprocessed dataset and optimized with Bayesian algorithm. CNN outperformed MLP to predict the risk level at intersections in practical application. Interpretability with SHAP method properly identified important features contributing to risk.

    Abstract Traditional methods for identifying crash-prone roadways are mainly based on historical crash data. It usually requires more than three years to collect a sufficient amount of dataset for road safety assessment. However, the emerging connected vehicles (CVs) technology generates rich instantaneous information, which can be used to identify dangerous road sections proactively. Information about the identified crash-prone intersections can be shared with the surrounding vehicles via CVs communication technology to promote cautious driving behaviors; in the longer term, such information will guide the implementation of countermeasures to prevent potential crashes. This study proposed a deep-learning based method to predict the risk level at intersections based on CVs data from the Michigan Safety Pilot program and historical traffic and intersection crash data in areas around Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. One month of data by CVs at intersections were used for analyses, which accounts for about 3%–12% of overall trips. The risk levels of 774 intersections (i.e., low, medium and high risk) are determined by the annual crash rates. Feature extraction process is applied to both CV’s data and traffic data at each intersection and 24 features are extracted. Two black-box deep-learning models, multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN) are trained with the extracted features. A number of hyperparameters that affect prediction performance are fine-tuned using Bayesian optimization algorithm for each model. The performance of the two deep learning models, which are black-box models, were also compared with a decision tree model, a white-box type of simple machine learning model. The results showed that the accuracies of deep learning (DL) models were slightly better (both over 90 %) than the decision tree model (about 87 %). This indicated that the DL models were capable of uncover the inherent complexity from the dataset and therefore provided higher accuracy than the traditional machine learning model. CNN model achieves slightly higher accuracy (93.8 %) and is recommended as the classifier to predict the risk level at intersections in practice. The interpretability analysis of the CNN model is conducted to confirm the validity of the model. This study shows that combination of CVs data (V2V and V2I) and deep learning networks (i.e. MLP and CNN used in this paper) is promising to determine crash risks at intersections with high time efficiency and at low CV penetration rates, which help to deploy countermeasures to reduce the crash rates and resolve traffic safety problems.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Efficient mapping of crash risk at intersections with connected vehicle data and deep learning models


    Contributors:
    Hu, Jiajie (author) / Huang, Ming-Chun (author) / Yu, Xiong (author) / Bill (author)


    Publication date :

    2020-06-27




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    Identifying High-Crash-Risk Intersections

    Lim, In-Kyu / Kweon, Young-Jun | Transportation Research Record | 2013


    Crash Estimation Models for Intersections

    Pulugurtha, Srinivas S. / Nujjetty, Anusha P. | ASCE | 2011



    Pedestrian crash estimation models for signalized intersections

    Pulugurtha, Srinivas S. / Sambhara, Venkata R. | Elsevier | 2010


    Pedestrian crash estimation models for signalized intersections

    Pulugurtha, Srinivas S. | Online Contents | 2011