Abstract Introduction: Sleep-deprived driving can be as dangerous as alcohol-impaired driving, however, little is known about attitudes toward sleep-deprived drivers. This study examined the extent to which young drivers regard sleep-deprived compared to drinking drivers as culpable for a crash, and how their perceptions of driving while in these conditions differ. Method: University student participants (N =295; M =20.4years, SD =1.3; 81% women) were randomly assigned to read one of five fatal motor-vehicle crash scenarios, which differed by aspects of the driver's condition. Culpability ratings for the drinking driver were higher than those for the sleep-deprived driver. Results: Qualitative findings revealed that driving while sleep-deprived was viewed as understandable, and driving after drinking was viewed as definitely wrong. The dangers of sleep-deprived driving remain under-recognized.
Highlights ► We examine sleep-deprived to drinking drivers as culpable for a crash, and perceptions of driving while in these conditions. ► Participants were randomly assigned to read one of five fatal motor vehicle crash scenarios. ► Culpability ratings for the drinking driver were higher than those for the sleep-deprived driver. ► Qualitative findings revealed that driving while sleep-deprived was viewed as understandable and driving after drinking was viewed as definitely wrong. ► The dangers of sleep-deprived driving remain under-recognised.
Young drivers’ perceptions of culpability of sleep-deprived versus drinking drivers
Journal of Safety Research ; 43 , 2 ; 115-122
2012-01-01
8 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
drowsy driving , sleepiness , fatigue , crash , attitudes
Young drivers’ perceptions of culpability of sleep-deprived versus drinking drivers
Online Contents | 2012
|Young drivers’ perceptions of risk and difficulty: Day versus night
Elsevier | 2020
|Young drivers: the problem of sleep
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003
|