Abstract Problem Motor-vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death in the United States. Seatbelts are highly effective in preventing serious injury and death in the event of a crash. Not all states have primary enforcement of seatbelt laws. Methods Data from the 2002, 2006, 2008, and 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used to calculate prevalence of seatbelt use by state and type of state seatbelt law (primary vs. secondary enforcement). Results and discussion Self-reported seatbelt use among adults in the United States increased steadily between 2002 and 2010, with the national prevalence reaching 87% in 2010. Overall, seatbelt use in 2010 was 9 percentage points higher in the states with primary enforcement laws than in the states with secondary enforcement laws (89% vs. 80%). Impact on industry: Primary enforcement seatbelt laws and enhanced enforcement of seatbelt laws are proven strategies for increasing seatbelt use and reducing traffic fatalities.
Highlights ► Primary enforcement seatbelt laws and enhanced enforcement of seatbelt laws are proven strategies for increasing seatbelt use. ► NHTSA estimated that nearly 450 additional lives would have been saved, 12,000 nonfatal injuries prevented, and $1.6 billion in societal costs saved in 2009 alone if all states had primary laws. ► Seatbelt use in states with secondary laws continues to lag behind that of states with primary laws.
Self-reported seatbelt use, United States, 2002–2010: Does prevalence vary by state and type of seatbelt law?
Journal of Safety Research ; 43 , 5-6 ; 417-420
2012-10-17
4 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Seatbelt controller, seatbelt device, and seatbelt control method
European Patent Office | 2015
|SEATBELT CONTROL DEVICE, SEATBELT APPARATUS, AND SEATBELT CONTROL METHOD
European Patent Office | 2016
|