Abstract Establishing a permanent lunar base has gained increasing attention since it offers opportunities for international cooperation and the commercialization of space, forming the foundation and testing ground for a human existence independent from Earth. Essential to future missions beyond cislunar space is the exploration and in situ processing of the Moon's resources, especially the sustainable production of energetic resources and propellants. Utilizing in situ generated propellants can dramatically reduce transportation costs by removing the need to source propellants from Earth. Resources on the Moon are limited, and the extraction of available resources are energy-intensive processes demanding advanced techniques and technologies. Consequently, one of the biggest challenges lies in developing process architectures with a positive energy balance, for which comprehensive analyses are still missing. The focus currently lies on the extraction of water ice from lunar regolith and the production of hydrogen and oxygen through water electrolysis. However, alternative fuel and process options may reduce the energy cost while providing equivalent energetic revenue. In the scope of this research, the infrastructure and technologies required for extraction, refining, and storing are assumed to exist in cislunar space; therefore, only the operating cost is considered. Exergy analyses of in situ extraction methods are conducted to investigate whether the required energetic budget allows sustainable implementation. The analysis includes extraction methods and propellant options to reveal the extent to which alternatives to hydrogen are feasible. Exergy analyses determine thermodynamic losses of energy flows giving the ground for process optimization. The exergy destructed represents the margin of improvement within the process architecture and thus reflects the process's thermodynamic and economic value while allowing a more distinct examination of energy use. Assuming the availability of water and carbon dioxide ice in permanently shadowed regions, the analysis shows that choosing methane instead of hydrogen in combination with oxygen as propellants can reduce the required exergy input by up to a third. An example mission allows to directly compare the operating cost of the extraction processes for the different propellant options. The mission entails a spacecraft propelled by a liquid bipropellant engine utilizing the extracted propellant and transporting a payload of the same propellant to a depot located in lunar near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO). Although abundant in space, the results suggest that hydrogen may not be the only or even energetically cost-effective resource for developing cislunar and Martian space infrastructures. Likewise, sustainable extraction of propellants suitable for current and future propulsion systems will foster humanity's reach further into the solar system.
Highlights The exergy destructed represents the margin of improvement within the process propellant source on the Moon Hydrogen may not be the only or even energetically cost-effective resource for developing cislunar and Martian space infrastructures. Servicing a depot in a lunar NRHO can reduce the required exergetic cost by a third if methane is utilized as the propellant instead of hydrogen
The Moon as an effective propellant source: A comprehensive exergy analysis from extraction to depot
Acta Astronautica ; 218 ; 307-313
2024-02-23
7 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Exergy , Moon , Propellent , Economical , Depot
AIAA | 1991
|Lunar L1 Earth-Moon Propellant Depot Orbital And Transfer Options Analysis (AAS 13-885)
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2014
|Tethered orbital propellant depot
NTRS | 1985
|Propellant transfer: Tethered depot
NTRS | 1984
|