Highlights Surrogate variables can sometimes be used to estimate crash modification factors. Directed acyclic graphical models can help identify surrogate candidates. CMF estimation is illustrated using simulation of pedestrian crashes and pedestrian hybrid beacons. CMF estimation is illustrating using simulation of left-turn crashes versus lane offset.
Abstract In road safety, a commonly-used measure of treatment effectiveness is the crash modification factor, usually defined as a ratio of the expected crash frequency with the treatment to the expected frequency without. This paper explores the possibility of using surrogates to estimate crash modification factors. As in other situations where observational data are used to estimate causal effects, it is necessary to leverage background causal knowledge with the observational results. When the background knowledge is such that a crash-generating mechanism can be represented with a directed acyclic graph, the connectivity structure of the graph can be used to identify candidate surrogates. The modification factor associated with a safety-related improvement can then, in principle, be estimated from knowledge of how the improvement affects the surrogates, together with information on how the surrogates are distributed in the population of crashes. After developing this relationship between surrogates and crash modification factors, its potential usefulness is illustrated with two simulation studies, where estimates of CMFs using surrogates are compared to estimates computed from crash frequencies.
Mechanisms, mediators, and surrogate estimation of crash modification factors
2020-12-30
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Transportation Research Record | 2012
|Crash reconstruction and crash modification factors
Online Contents | 2014
|Crash reconstruction and crash modification factors
Elsevier | 2013
|Novel Crash Surrogate Measure for Freeways
ASCE | 2020
|Intersection Safety Improvement Using Crash Modification Factors
Springer Verlag | 2022
|