Highlights ► Tests direct valuations of safety and time saving. ► Compares to valuations inferred on basis of other trade-offs. ► Finds inconsistency in different valuations. ► Applies behavioural economic theories of framing and mental accounting to explain results. ► Raises questions as to validity of monetised values given possibly intransitive preferences.

    Abstract Governments around the world use monetised values of transport externalities to undertake project appraisal and cost–benefit analysis. However, because different types of benefits are monetised (e.g., travel time savings, preventing statistical fatalities, reliability, etc.) the question naturally arises as to whether they are consistent. That is, whether a “dollar is a dollar” as welfare economics requires, or whether spending money in one area carries a different disutility from spending money in another area. This would equate to a violation of fungibility, which is the property of a good or a commodity whose individual units are capable of mutual substitution. The view that money is not fungible is explained in behavioural economics through theories of framing and mental accounting. This paper describes the results of a stated choice experiment designed to test the fungibility and consistency of monetary valuations in transport. From a nationally representative sample, we elicit direct values for the three pairwise trade-offs between travel time, travel cost, and safety. We then show that in the context of our analysis, any trade-offs inferred on the basis of other trade-offs, as is common practice (e.g. inferring a safety vs time trade-off on the basis of monetary valuations for time and safety), produces biased results, suggesting that the assumption of fungibility does not hold. Specifically, we find that time is valued more highly when valued directly by cost than when traded with safety, and the reverse is true for safety.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Consistency and fungibility of monetary valuations in transport: An empirical analysis of framing and mental accounting effects


    Contributors:

    Published in:

    Publication date :

    2012-05-16


    Size :

    10 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English





    Estimation of New Monetary Valuations of Travel Time, Quality of Travel, and Safety for Singapore

    Hess, Stephane / Murphy, Paul / Le, Henry et al. | Transportation Research Record | 2017


    Railway accounting, mental and mechanical

    Donaldson, J.S. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1912


    Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions

    Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy | Online Contents | 2001


    Review of service quality valuations

    Wardman, M. / Planning and Transport Research and Computation International Association | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998