Abstract This paper presents innovative approaches for guidance of spacecraft formations during reconfiguration, developed under the paradigms of cluster autonomy and safe maneuverability. A task-assignment algorithm identifies those satellites that need to be rearranged in order to minimize the total propellant consumption. The decision process relies on convex optimization procedures which estimate control laws and maneuvering trajectories, accounting for thruster technology constraints and collision avoidance. The path-planning has a twofold implementation. In the centralized approach, the reconfiguration strategy is elaborated by a single unit: the maneuvering trajectories are generated considering solely collision avoidance constraints at expenses of computational costs. The alternative method is conceived such that each satellite autonomously determines its tasks. This de-centralized architecture allows the algorithm to run faster, but entails a higher traffic on the intersatellite communication link. In addition, collision avoidance is approximated to make each optimization independent from the other. For preliminary validation of the developed routines, a specific mission scenario is considered, with a distributed Synthetic Aperture Radar in a low Earth orbit that has to be reconfigured for tomographic applications. Simulation results show that, once remote-sensing requirements are specified within the limits set by standard products, the developed algorithms can manage autonomously the maneuver towards the corresponding operative pattern. In details, the centralized approach allows the reconfiguration to be handled with mean delta-v savings around 30%. On the contrary, strategies are elaborated by the decentralized planners about 7 times faster.

    Highlights Innovative approaches are proposed for formation guidance during reconfigurations. Strategies account for thruster technology and collision avoidance constraints. The path-planning is implemented depending on the distributed system architecture. Techniques are compared in terms of total delta-v and time for maneuver elaboration. The reconfiguration of a small-sat distributed radar is considered as test-case.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Path planning and guidance algorithms for SAR formation reconfiguration: Comparison between centralized and decentralized approaches


    Contributors:
    Sarno, S. (author) / D'Errico, M. (author) / Guo, J. (author) / Gill, E. (author)

    Published in:

    Acta Astronautica ; 167 ; 404-417


    Publication date :

    2019-11-12


    Size :

    14 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    Centralized and Decentralized Multimodal Statewide Transportation Planning

    Miller, John S. / Evans, Linda D. | Transportation Research Record | 2006




    Centralized or decentralized management?

    Kaufman, Lawrence H. | IuD Bahn | 2000


    Comparison of centralized and decentralized traction power supply

    Brauner, G. | British Library Online Contents | 1996