Abstract In this paper, we study how the distributional preferences of planners and the public diverge in the context of national infrastructure planning. To do so, we surveyed a sample of 323 planners working at the Swedish Transport Administration and 2,108 members of the Swedish public. The most striking difference is that planners place a relatively higher value on aggregate benefits than the public. Planners also place a significantly higher relative value on infrastructure plans that benefit rail transport compared to the public. It is our contention that planners value aggregate benefits relatively more highly because they have a better understanding of the attribute and because they have internalised the long-standing goal of an economically efficient Swedish transport sector.
Do the distributional preferences of national infrastructure planners diverge from those of the public?
2023-02-12
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Equilibrium at a bottleneck when long-run and short-run scheduling preferences diverge
Online Contents | 2013
|Road traffic noise models diverge
Online Contents | 1996
|Analysis of Merge and Diverge Segments
Springer Verlag | 2014
|Distributional effects of infrastructure pricing rules
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|