The naturalistic study investigated the potential influence of personal driving preferences (assertive and defensive driving style) on users; comfort when being driven in an automated vehicle with a defensive driving style. Adopted the Wizard of Oz design, the study involved three phases: pre-, during, and post-driven to measure their comfort, perceived safety, and likeness as well as motion sickness propensity through self-report questionnaire and heart rate variation. After answering a set of questionnaires, participants were exposed to simulated driving in an automated vehicle with a defensive driving style. A statistical analysis produced no statistically significant difference between assertive and defensive participants. This indicates an overall preference, perceived comfort without severe motion sickness propensity to the defensive driving style of the autonomous vehicle, regardless of participants’ personal driving styles.
Analysis of User’s Comfort on Automated Vehicle Riding Simulation using Subjective and Objective Measurements
2022
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Vehicle Riding Comfort Analysis of the Seat
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1992
|Ride and Comfort Measurements - A Challenge of Subjective and Objective Correlation
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2021
|SAE Technical Papers | 1951
|Ride and Comfort Measurements - A Challenge of Subjective and Objective Correlation
SAE Technical Papers | 2021
|