In many bilateral investment treaties, the investor is allowed to submit its claim to domestic courts, arbitration or any other agreed tribunals. Offering different options to the investor for the method of dispute resolution could lead to some problems, such as conflicting decisions and ambiguous interpretations. Because of these problems, some states have placed some restrictions upon investors and prohibited them from submitting their claims in different courts or tribunals at the same time. Fork in the road is a specific clause requiring the investor to make a final decision and choose a specific court or tribunal, among all competent courts and tribunals, to submit its claim. Choosing any tribunal prevents other tribunals from having jurisdiction. This article aims to examine international arbitration practice regarding fork in the road clause by focusing on ICSID awards.
Fork in the Road Clause in International Trade Arbitration Practice by focusing on ICSID Verdicts
2019
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Show-ICSID '95, Asian challenge
Online Contents | 1995
|Road Test Results - Our exclusive facts, figures and verdicts
Online Contents | 1994
Road Test Results - Our exclusive facts, figures and verdicts
Online Contents | 1994
ROAD TEST YEARBOOK Our verdicts on the year's best cars
Online Contents | 1994
New cars A-Z - Prices, verdicts and road test top fives
Online Contents | 2011