Urban public transport energy use is determined largely by the weight of the vehicle, and frequency of intermediate stops, imposing repeated acceleration/steady running/braking cycles, in which much of the kinetic energy is dissipated. Energy consumed for the same capacity and vehicle performance may be reduced by coasting, cutting vehicle weight, and use of regenerative braking, on electrically‐powered systems, to convert the otherwise wasted braking energy into useful form. Particular attention is paid to the last‐named, identifying results of past experience and recent simulations. Practical constraints limiting the amount of energy actually recovered are discussed, including proportion of vehicle weight braked electrically, receptivity of the supply system, stop spacing and number of vehicles operated simultaneously. Reference is also made to battery vehicles and flywheel energy storage.
It is suggested that considerable scope exists in urban electric rail operation for reduced energy consumption, as existing fleets are replaced by lighter weight vehicles, fitted for regenerative braking. Further savings may come from use of inverter equipment. Rate of fleet renewal may be an important factor. Buses are already much more energy efficient, and dramatic gains are unlikely. However, there is some scope for use of flywheel energy storage, and regenerative braking on trolleybuses.
Energy conservation in urban public transport
Transportation Planning and Technology ; 7 , 3 ; 143-152
1982-06-01
10 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Optimization of urban public transportation systems for energy conservation
Kraftfahrwesen | 1991
|Bus for Urban Public Transport: Energy Performance Optimization
Tema Archiv | 2014
|TIBKAT | 1994
|Transport energy conservation conference
Kraftfahrwesen | 1980
|Determining Urban Public Transport Supply
Wiley | 2013
|