This paper contrasts the economic policies adopted towards seaports by different countries in terms of their approaches to national, regional or local control. Various examples are presented and described, together with some of the difficulties that have been encountered. Examples are cited where national, regional and local governments have become involved, even though constitutional provisions appeared to present this. It is argued that national, regional and local governments all have interests in the efficiency of ports from various points of view; hence all should be involved. The arguments for and difficulties experienced in centralized planning and co-ordination are also discussed.
The variety of activities directly undertaken by port authorities is discussed, with the extreme positions labelled ‘landlord’ and ‘comprehensive’. The remarkable variety of intermediate positions is also described. Whilst oversimplification is dangerous, the opportunities for expanding the private sector are analysed, even to the extent of wondering whether public sector port authorities are needed at all. This, therefore is the subject of the next paper.
Economic policies and seaports: The diversity of port policies†
Maritime Policy & Management ; 17 , 3 ; 221-234
01.09.1990
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Economic policies and seaports: Strategies for port authorities†
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1990
|Economic policies and seaports: Are port authorities necessary?†
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1990
|Economic policies and seaports: The economic functions of seaports†
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1990
|Italian seaports' competition policies: Facts and figures
Online Contents | 2013
|German seaports: Action urgently required on infrastructural and regulatory policies
Online Contents | 1999