Scientific machine learning and the advent of the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) have shown high potential in their ability to solve complex differential equations. One example is the use of PINNs to solve the gravity field modeling problem—learning convenient representations of the gravitational potential from position and acceleration data. These PINN gravity models, or PINN-GMs, have demonstrated advantages in model compactness, robustness to noise, and sample efficiency when compared to popular alternatives; however, further investigation has revealed various failure modes for these and other machine learning gravity models which this manuscript aims to address. Specifically, this paper introduces the third generation Physics-Informed Neural Network Gravity Model (PINN-GM-III) which includes design changes that solve the problems of feature divergence, bias towards low-altitude samples, numerical instability, and extrapolation error. Six evaluation metrics are proposed to expose these past pitfalls and illustrate the PINN-GM-III’s robustness to them. This study concludes by evaluating the PINN-GM-III modeling accuracy on a heterogeneous density asteroid, and comparing its performance to other analytic and machine learning gravity models.
The Physics-Informed Neural Network Gravity Model Generation III
The Physics-Informed Neural Network Gravity Model Generation III J. Martin et al.
J Astronaut Sci
21.03.2025
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
The Physics-Informed Neural Network Gravity Model Generation III
Springer Verlag | 2025
|Physics-Informed Neural Network Model for Predictive Risk Assessment and Safety Analysis
Transportation Research Record | 2024
|Physics-informed Neural Network Predictive Control for Quadruped Locomotion
ArXiv | 2025
|