In this paper, the differences between the 2017 version of C-IASI and the 2018 version of C-NCAP are analyzed respectively. Based on the side impact test results of an SUV model under both evaluation methods, the differential analysis is carried out from the aspects of MDB quality, MDB posture and impact position, and the vehicle body response as well as dummy injury were compared based on the above difference points. The results show that with the same SUV model structure, the deformation of the front door structure under C-IASI evaluation test is significantly worse than that of C-NCAP, while the rear door structure deformed consistently. From the comparison of the margin value about dummy injury, which can be seen that C-IASI front row dummy torso damage value is higher, while the back row dummy injury value is closer. Above research provides participation for vehicle side-impact safety performance design under different conditions.
The Vehicle Structure Response and Dummy Injury Research Based on C-IASI and C-NCAP Side-Impact Conditions
Lect. Notes Electrical Eng.
2022-01-13
12 pages
Aufsatz/Kapitel (Buch)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2022
|Rear Female Dummy Submarining Research Base on C-NCAP Regulation
Trans Tech Publications | 2014
|Comparison on rating methods for female dummy in NCAP frontal impact test
Online Contents | 2014
|Comparison on rating methods for female dummy in NCAP frontal impact test
British Library Online Contents | 2014
|