To date, anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) have not been designed with consideration for human motion in far-side impacts. Previous tests with a cadaver and a BioSID dummy at the Medical College of Wisconsin confirmed that the dummy does not suitably model the human motion. To further evaluate different ATDs in far-side crashes, MAthematical DYnamic MOdeling (MADYMO) was employed. The modeling showed that the motion of a Hybrid III, BioSID, EuroSid1, EuroSID2, or SID2s did not accurately reflect the motion of a human cadaver under the same impact configurations as the cadaver test. The MADYMO human facet model was found to closely reproduce the kinematics of the cadaver test. The effect of varying console designs on occupant kinematics is presented in this paper. The human facet model appears to be a good interim tool for the evaluation of countermeasures in far-side crashes.
Far-Side Impact Vehicle Simulations with MADYMO
Sae Technical Papers
SAE World Congress & Exhibition ; 2007
2007-04-16
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Englisch
Far-Side Impact Vehicle Simulations with MADYMO
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|2007-01-0363 Far-Side Impact Vehicle Simulations with MADYMO
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|Kraftfahrwesen | 1983
|SAE Technical Papers | 1983
|Optimization of the Side Airbag System Using MADYMO Simulations
SAE Technical Papers | 2007
|