Moose collisions injure and kill a multitude of animals and humans each year. While in-vehicle warning systems are under development, the evaluation of these systems is a challenging process. In comparison with traditional on-road instrumented vehicles, driving simulators offer safer testing environments, but pose validity concerns. To understand the validity issues, this study replicates and expands upon Robins's [1] on-road findings in “Moose Visibility Distance in Nighttime Highway Driving Conditions: A Preliminary Investigation”. The significant effect of moose location on perception time is supported while our data suggests that typical speed limits are even more problematic than Robins demonstrated. The results are discussed with a focus on understanding the validity of simulated driving and establishing future validation research directions.
Using Driving Simulators to Expand Moose Perception Data: Some Results and Validity Issues
Sae Technical Papers
SAE World Congress & Exhibition ; 2007
2007-04-16
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Englisch
Using Driving Simulators to Expand Moose Perception Data: Some Results and Validity Issues
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|Using driving simulators to expand moose perception data: some results and validity issues
Kraftfahrwesen | 2007
|Behavioural validity of driving simulators for prototype HMI evaluation
Wiley | 2020
|Subjective Validity of Bicycle Simulators
TIBKAT | 2020
|Flight Training Selection Using Simulators - A Validity Assessment
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|