Natural gas is a viable alternative fuel to obtain low exhaust emissions. A heavy duty DI Diesel engine was converted to Otto cycle natural gas operation. Two alternative solutions were compared: Power and efficiency were similar for the two above solutions, and exhaust temperature resulted similar to the diesel engine in both cases due to the diluted operation.The lean bum engine met EURO II ECE-R49 limits except for total hydrocarbons. Stoichiometric engine emissions resulted much lower than the limits. Particulate emissions were quite negligible for the two solutions.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Comparison Between Lean-Burn and Stoichiometric Technologies for CNG Heavy-Duty Engines


    Weitere Titelangaben:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Beteiligte:
    Unich, A. (Autor:in) / Gambino, M. (Autor:in) / Corbo, P. (Autor:in) / Iannaccone, S. (Autor:in)

    Kongress:

    International Congress & Exposition ; 1995



    Erscheinungsdatum :

    1995-02-01




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Print


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Comparison between lean-burn and stoichiometric technologies for CNG heavy-duty engines

    Corbo,P. / Gambino,M. / Iannaccone,S. et al. | Kraftfahrwesen | 1995


    Comparison Between Lean-Burn and Stoichiometric Technologies for CNG Heavy-Duty Engines

    Corbo, P. / Gambino, M. / Iannaccone, S. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995


    Lean-Burn Technology for CNG Heavy Duty Engines

    Gambino, M. / Corbo, P. / Iannaccone, S. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994


    Lean-burn technology for CNG heavy duty engines

    Gambino,M. / Corbo,P. / Innaccone,S. et al. | Kraftfahrwesen | 1994


    Lean-Burn Technology for CNG Heavy Duty Engines

    Gambino, M. / Corbo, P. / Iannaccone, S. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994