Emission engineers are currently evaluating several catalyst substrate designs, such as monoliths and beads, for use in automotive converters. One of their problems is to design converters that provide adequate control of the engine exhaust emissions but that do not significantly increase back pressure. In this paper, the design tradeoffs between pressure drop and conversion efficiency are examined for monolith, bead, Raschig ring, and wire mesh catalyst substrates. It is shown that monolith substrates provide the best flexibility when designing converters to satisfy vehicle installation space and engine back pressure requirements. Bead substrates have higher potential conversion efficiencies than monoliths but are less adaptable to vehicle space requirements.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Comparison of Catalyst Substrates for Catalytic Converter Systems


    Weitere Titelangaben:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Beteiligte:

    Kongress:

    National Automobile Engineering Meeting ; 1973



    Erscheinungsdatum :

    1973-02-01




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Print


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    A New Material for Catalytic Converter Substrates

    Sukonnik, I. M. / Chang, S. / Jha, B. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997


    Catalytic Converter Diagnosis Using the Catalyst Exotherm

    Theis, Joseph R. | SAE Technical Papers | 1994


    DuraFoil ICR - a new material for catalytic converter substrates

    Sukonnik,I.M. / Chang,S. / Jha,B. et al. | Kraftfahrwesen | 1997


    Evaluation of High Cell Density Substrates for Advanced Catalytic Converter Emissions Control

    Moore, W. R. / Richmond, R. P. / Vaneman, G. L. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999


    Catalytic converter modeling: artificial neural networks for perovskite based catalyst

    Biniwale,R.B. / Labhsetwar,N.K. / Kumar,R. et al. | Kraftfahrwesen | 2002