Abstract This paper assesses the economic justification for the selection of priority projects defined under the auspices of the Trans-European transport network. Three different transport models are used to analyse the costs and benefits associated with the current list of 30 priority projects. Most of these projects fail the cost-benefit test and few of the economically justifiable projects would need European subsidies to ensure their viability. Two remedies are proposed to minimise the inefficiencies surrounding project selection. The first remedy would oblige each member state or group of states to perform a cost-benefit analysis, followed by peer review and ensure that the results were published publicly prior to the ranking of federally funded priority projects. The second remedy would require federal funding to be made available only for projects with important spillovers to other countries in order to avoid pork barrel political behaviour.
Do the selected Trans European transport investments pass the cost benefit test?
Transportation ; 41 , 1
2013
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
BKL: | 74.75$jVerkehrsplanung$jVerkehrspolitik / 55.80$jVerkehrswesen$jTransportwesen: Allgemeines / 55.80 Verkehrswesen, Transportwesen: Allgemeines / 74.75 Verkehrsplanung, Verkehrspolitik |
Do the selected Trans European transport investments pass the cost benefit test?
Online Contents | 2013
|Cost-benefit analysis of transport investments in distorted economies
Online Contents | 2010
|Cost-benefit analysis of transport investments in distorted economies
Elsevier | 2009
|Cost–Benefit Analysis of Transport Investments: An Application to High-Speed Rail Investments
Springer Verlag | 2023
|