INTRODUCTION: Sleepiness is commonly reported amongst commercial airline pilots and is recognized as a safety risk due to its impact on performance. Controlled Rest (CR) refers to a short, voluntary nap opportunity taken by pilots on the flight deck as a countermeasure to unanticipated sleepiness in flight. This study explores the profile of CR use in a long-haul commercial airline. METHODS: Forty-four pilots filled in an application-based sleep/work diary and wore actiwatches for approximately 2 weeks. Complete data sets from 239 flights including sleep diaries, actigraphy, and schedules were merged and analyzed. Sleep diary entries were used to set CR intervals in the actigraphy software, which was then used to predict sleep within these intervals. All time-stamps of sleep periods and flight schedules were adjusted for home-base time of the pilots. Pearson Correlations were used to assess the influence of pilot demographics on CR use. A mixed-effects logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of schedule factors on CR. RESULTS: Pilots reported taking CR on 46% (n=110) of observed flights. Average CR attempt duration was 43.1 ± 11.0 minutes. Eighty-percent (n=106/133) of all CR attempts were estimated by actigraphy to have successfully achieved sleep with an average sleep duration during successful rest periods of 31.7 ± 12.2 minutes. Captains reported taking CR on 38% of flights (n=39/102), compared to First Officers reporting 52% (n=71/137) of flights with CR (p=0.131). Age, experience, BMI, and sleep need were not associated with the percentage of flights with CR (all p>0.244). The following schedule factors were associated with a higher frequency of CR: night (55%, n=76) vs. day flights (34%, n=34); <10h (63%, n=80) vs. >10h duration flights (27%, n=30); return (60%, n=71) vs. outbound flights (33%, n=39); and 2-pilot (69%, n=83) vs. >2-pilot flights (23%, n=27) (all p≤0.001). There was a trend for more CR on eastbound flights, but this was not significant (eastbound: 51%, n= 57; westbound: 40%, n= 44; p=0.059). Of note, 22% (n=26) of augmented flights (>2-pilots) contained both CR and Bunk Rest (in a designated rest facility). DISCUSSION: Data from this airline show that pilots commonly use CR to mitigate sleepiness in-flight, especially on flights <10h duration and during home-base nighttime flights. Future studies are required to determine generalizability of these results to other airlines.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Controlled Rest: Investigating the Use of an In-Flight Sleepiness Countermeasure


    Beteiligte:

    Kongress:

    91st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Aerospace Medical Association ; 2021 ; virtual, US


    Medientyp :

    Sonstige


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Controlled Rest: Investigating the Use of an In-Flight Sleepiness Countermeasure

    C. J. Hilditch / L. Arsintescu / K. B. Gregory et al. | NTIS | 2021


    The Prevalence of Controlled Rest as a Countermeasure to Sleepiness on the Flight Deck

    Hilditch, Cassie J. / Arsintescu, Lucia / Gregory, Kevin B. et al. | NTRS | 2019


    Can Pre-Flight Subjective Sleepiness Predict the Use of Controlled Rest on the Flight Deck?

    C. J. Hilditch / L. Arsintescu / S. Pradhan et al. | NTIS | 2023


    Can Pre-Flight Subjective Sleepiness Predict the Use of Controlled Rest on the Flight Deck?

    Cassie J. Hilditch / Lucica Arsintescu / Sean Pradhan et al. | NTRS


    Sleep, Sleepiness, and Performance Across Three In-Flight Bunk Rest Opportunities

    Cassie J Hilditch / Lucia Arsintescu / Kevin B Gregory et al. | NTRS