The science community has had success in remote field experiences using two distinctly different models for humans-in-the-loop: the Apollo Science Support team (science backroom), and the robotic exploration of Mars. In the Apollo experience, the science team helped train the crew, designed geologic traverses, and made real-time decisions by reviewing audio and video transmissions and providing recommendations for geologic sampling. In contrast, the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) and Mars Science Lab (MSL) missions have been conducted entirely robotically, with significant time delays between science- driven decisions and remote field activities. Distinctive operations methods and field methodologies were developed for MER/MSL [1,2] because of the reliance on the "backroom" science team (rather than astronaut crew members) to understand the surroundings. Additionally, data are relayed to the team once per day, giving the team many hours or even days to assimilate the data and decide on a plan of action.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Next-generation Strategies for Human Lunar Sorties


    Beteiligte:
    Cohen, B. A. (Autor:in)

    Kongress:

    Golden Spike Human Lunar Expeditions: Opportunities for Intensive Lunar Scientific Exploration ; 2013 ; Houston, TX, United States


    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2013-10-03


    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch





    AIAA-2006-7505 An Alternate Approach to Lunar Missions - Human Sorties at Half the Price

    Stevens, J. / Hopkins, J. / American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006


    Kills, sorties and dollars

    BENNETT, JIM | AIAA | 1989