As recent history has tragically demonstrated, a successful space mission is not complete until the crew has safely returned to earth and has been successfully recovered. It is noted that a safe return to earth does not guarantee a successful recovery. The focus of this presentation will be a discussion of the ground operation assets involved in a successful recovery. The author's experience in land and water-based recovery of crewed vehicles and flight hardware at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Edwards Air Force Base, international landing sites, and the Atlantic Ocean provides for some unique insight into this topic. He has participated in many aspects of Space Shuttle landing and recovery operations including activation of Transatlantic Abort Landing (TAL) sites and Emergency Landing Sites (ELS) as an Operations Test Director, execution of post landing convoy operations as an Orbiter Move Director, Operations Test Director, and Landing and Recovery Director, and recovery of solid rocket boosters, frustum and their parachutes 140 miles offshore in a wide range of sea states as a Retrieval Diver/Engineer. The recovery operations for the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo were similar from a landing and recovery perspective in th t they all were capsules with limited "flying" capability and had a planned End of Mission (EOM) in an ocean with a descent slowed by parachutes. The general process was to deploy swim teams via helicopters to prepare the capsule for recovery and assist with crew extraction when required. The capsule was then hoisted onto the deck of a naval vessel. This approach required the extensive use and deployment of military assets to support the primary landing zone as well as alternate and contingency locations. The Russian Soyuz capsule also has limited "flying" capability; however, the planned EOM is terrestrial. In addition to use of parachutes to slow the reentry descent, soft-landing rockets on the bottom of the vehicle are employed to cushion the landing. The recovery forces are deployed via helicopters and the capsule is transported by a specialized all-terrain vehicle. The Space Shuttle Orbiter landing and recovery process is considerably different. The added lift capability and maneuverability allow the Orbiter to land at an exact location/runway for a nominal EOM. This allows for a timely response of recovery/contingency rescue forces, centralized staging of personnel and equipment, and assured access by ground vehicles. The well defined landing zone also provides for far more options when selecting landing sites for EOM and emergency returns and the relatively large cross-range capability increases the number of landing opportunities at the preferred sites.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Manned Spacecraft Landing and Recovery


    Beteiligte:
    Hammel, Don (Autor:in)

    Kongress:

    AIAA SPACE 2004 Conference and Exposition ; 2004 ; San Diego, CA, United States


    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2004-03-10


    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    The First Manned Lunar Landing Spacecraft

    Fleisig, R. / International Astronautical Federation | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994


    The First Manned Lunar Landing Spacecraft

    Fleisig, R. / International Academy of Astronautics | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001


    LANDING ROCKET - GLIDING PARACHUTE LANDING SYSTEMS FOR MANNED SPACECRAFT

    SUIT, KENNETH / KIKER, JOHN / HINSON, JAMES | AIAA | 1964


    Attenuation of Landing Impact for Manned Spacecraft

    Benson, H. E. / Mc Cullough, J. E. / Stafford, F. A. | NTRS | 1964


    Attenuation of Landing Impact for Manned Spacecraft

    H. E. Benson / J. E. Mc Cullough / F. A. Stafford | NTIS | 1964