Three model reference adaptive controllers (MRAC) with varying levels of complexity were evaluated on a high performance jet aircraft and compared along with a baseline nonlinear dynamic inversion controller. The handling qualities and performance of the controllers were examined during failure conditions that induce coupling between the pitch and roll axes. Results from flight tests showed with a roll to pitch input coupling failure, the handling qualities went from Level 2 with the baseline controller to Level 1 with the most complex MRAC tested. A failure scenario with the left stabilator frozen also showed improvement with the MRAC. Improvement in performance and handling qualities was generally seen as complexity was incrementally added; however, added complexity usually corresponds to increased verification and validation effort required for certification. The tradeoff between complexity and performance is thus important to a controls system designer when implementing an adaptive controller on an aircraft. This paper investigates this relation through flight testing of several controllers of vary complexity.
Handling Qualities of Model Reference Adaptive Controllers with Varying Complexity for Pitch-Roll Coupled Failures
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference
;
2011
;
Portland, OR, United States
AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference
;
2011
;
Portland, OR, United States
AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference
;
2011
;
Portland, OR, United States
2011-08-08
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Keine Angabe
Englisch
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011
|