This presentation considers the use of new launch vehicles in defense against near-Earth objects, building upon expertise in launch vehicle and spacecraft design, astronomy and planetary science and missile defense. This work also seeks to demonstrate the synergy needed between architectures for human/robotic exploration initiatives and planetary defense. Three different mitigation operations were baselined for this study--nuclear standoff explosion, kinetic interceptor, and solar collector--however, these are not the only viable options. The design and predicted performance of each of these methods is discussed and compared. It is determined that the nuclear interceptor option can deflect NEOs of smaller size (100-500 m) with 2 years or more time before impact, and larger NEOs with 5 or more years warning; kinetic interceptors may be effective for deflection of asteroids up to 300-400 m but require 8-10 years warning time; and, solar collectors may be able to deflect NEOs up to 1 km if issues pertaining to long operation can be overcome. Ares I and Ares V vehicles show sufficient performance to enable the development of a near-term categorization and mitigation architecture.
Near Earth Object (NEO) Mitigation Options Using Exploration Technologies
Asteroid Deflection Research Symposium 2008 ; 2008 ; Virginia, United States
2008-10-23
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Near Earth object mitigation studies
IEEE | 2016
|Transfer Options for Missions to Near Earth Object...
AIAA | 2005
|Synergistic Activities of Near-Earth Object Exploration
NTRS | 2011
|Near-Earth Object Threat Mitigation Using a Tethered Ballast Mass
Online Contents | 2009
|