NASA's Modeling and Simulation Standard requires a credibility assessment for critical engineering data produced by models and simulations. Credibility assessment is thus a "qualifyingfactor" in reporting results from simulation-based analysis. The degree to which assessors should be independent of the simulation developers, users and decision makers is a recurring question. This paper provides alternative "weighting algorithms" for calculating the value-added for independence of the levels of technical review defined for the NASA Modeling and Simulation Standard.
Notional Scoring for Technical Review Weighting As Applied to Simulation Credibility Assessment
2008 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop (SIW)/Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) ; 2008 ; Providence, RI, United States
14.04.2008
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Keine Angabe
Englisch