Adaptive automation (AA) has been explored as a solution to the problems associated with human-automation interaction in supervisory control environments. However, research has focused on the performance effects of dynamic control allocations of early stage sensory and information acquisition functions. The present research compares the effects of AA to the entire range of information processing stages of human operators, such as air traffic controllers. The results provide evidence that the effectiveness of AA is dependent on the stage of task performance (human-machine system information processing) that is flexibly automated. The results suggest that humans are better able to adapt to AA when applied to lower-level sensory and psychomotor functions, such as information acquisition and action implementation, as compared to AA applied to cognitive (analysis and decision-making) tasks. The results also provide support for the use of AA, as compared to completely manual control. These results are discussed in terms of implications for AA design for aviation.
Workload-Matched Adaptive Automation Support of Air Traffic Controller Information Processing Stages
2002
34 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Measures for air traffic controller workload prediction
AIAA | 2001
|The Modelling of Air Traffic Controller Workload
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
|