As light time delays increase, the number of such situations in which crew autonomy is the best way to conduct the mission is expected to increase. However, there are significant open questions regarding which functions to allocate to ground and crew as the time delays increase. In situations where the ideal solution is to allocate responsibility to the crew and the vehicle, a second question arises: should the activity be the responsibility of the crew or an automated vehicle function. More specifically, we must answer the following questions: What aspects of mission operation responsibilities (Plan, Train, Fly) should be allocated to ground based or vehicle based planning, monitoring, and control in the presence of significant light-time delay between the vehicle and the Earth.How should the allocated ground based planning, monitoring, and control be distributed across the flight control team and ground system automation. How should the allocated vehicle based planning, monitoring, and control be distributed between the flight crew and onboard system automation.When during the mission should responsibility shift from flight control team to crew or from crew to vehicle, and what should the process of shifting responsibility be as the mission progresses. NASA is developing a roadmap of capabilities for Autonomous Mission Operations for human spaceflight. This presentation will describe the current state of development of this roadmap, with specific attention to in-space inspection tasks that crews might perform with minimum assistance from the ground.
Autonomous Mission Operations Roadmap
2014
43 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Autonomous Mission Operations Roadmap
NTRS | 2014
|A Roadmap for Progressive Autonomy in Mission Operations
AIAA | 2006
|IEEE | 2013
|Autonomous Operations Mission Development Suite
NTIS | 2016
|Autonomous Operations Mission Development Suite
NTRS | 2016
|