The Air Force reorganization in 1992 changed the way in which airlift forces were organized, commanded and deployed. The reorganization eliminated the Airlift Divisions and created two airlift systems. The theater cargo aircraft were assigned to the theater commanders or to Air Combat Command. The strategic aircraft and support assets were assigned to Air Mobility Command. Both airlift systems must function together during a contingency to provide cargo movement. This project identifies a problem with the command of the airlift system and proposes a solution. In the process, it defines the key personnel and organizations that make up the airlift command and control structure. The paper also defines the necessary command relationship terms of combat command (COCOM), operational control (OP CON), tactical control (TACON), and support. It also identifies other relationships, such as coordinating authority and direct liaison authorized (DIRLAUTH). The primary conclusion is that the director of mobility forces (DIRMOBFOR) should have the authority to effectively command and control both airlift systems. Specifically, the DIRMOBFOR should be given OPCON or TACON over the forces that make up the airlift system.
Director of Mobility Forces and Command and Control of Airlift
1996
56 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Logistics Military Facilities & Supplies , Common Carrier & Satellite , Command and control systems , Military commanders , Airlift operations , Warfare , Theater level operations , Crisis management , Military aircraft , Aerial warfare , Strategic weapons , Transport aircraft , Cargo handling , Airmobile operations
Command and Control of Theater Airlift
NTIS | 1997
|Optimization Modeling for Airlift Mobility
NTIS | 1995
|Route to Airlift Mobility through Partnership /RAMPART/
AIAA | 1980
|Director of flight operations for airlift and tanker programmes at Boeing
Emerald Group Publishing | 1998