This strategic research paper explores the viability of a national missile defense system designed to defend the United States against ballistic missile attack. It explores the question of whether national missile defense is feasible. To answer this question, the author examines the ballistic missile threat to the United States posed by Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran. Next, he examines the technological challenges, costs, and geopolitical ramifications involved in developing and fielding a national missile defense system. In addition, the potential reactions of Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, NATO, and Europe to a national missile defense system in the United States is addressed. After discussing these issues, the author offers an alternative to the current U.S. missile defense policy and national missile defense plan. (29 refs.).
Ground-Based Missile Defense (National Missile Defense): Is It Feasible
2004
27 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Antimissile Defense Systems , Antimissile defense systems , Government(Foreign) , Attitudes(Psychology) , Geopolitics , Reaction(Psychology) , North korea , India , Pakistan , Nato , Europe , Policies , United states government , International politics , Threats , Cost estimates , Japan , Russia , Ground based , Iran , National defense , South korea , China , Taiwan , Intercontinental ballistic missiles , Missile defense policy , Missile defense plan , Usawc strategy research project , Technical feasibility
National missile defense (NMD)
IEEE | 2002
|Online Contents | 2007
American National Missile Defense System
Online Contents | 2003
|National Missile Defense Contingency Deployment
NTIS | 1995
|Articles - National Missile Defense (NMD)
Online Contents | 2002
|