The following are among the Study Group's principal conclusions: (1) The Navy needs an Engineering Duty (ED) community of highly trained, experienced, professional naval engineers to technically direct the design, acquisition and maintenance of ships and combat systems, (2) There is need for an official document delineating the role and responsibilities of EDs as naval officers, as a community of professional engineers specializing in ships and combat systems, and as individuals accepting responsibility for technical matters in all assignments. (3) EDs should provide increased technical leadership and direction of design, acquisition and maintenance of ship combat systems, (4) EDs need capability in financial management and contracting; (5) There is a need for unrestricted line subspecialists in the design, acquisition and maintenance of ships and combat systems; and (6) The existing ED billet structure does not fit the EDs' role. With appropriate changes, such as reducing sea billets, the number of officers needed may be smaller.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Report of Study Group to Determine Navy Requirements for Engineering Duty Officers and the Actions to Satisfy those Requirements


    Erscheinungsdatum :

    1976


    Format / Umfang :

    105 pages


    Medientyp :

    Report


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch





    How Commercial Satellites Satisfy Military-Like Requirements

    Fenech, Hector / Amos, Sonya / Moltzau, Eric et al. | AIAA | 2017



    Optimization of complex structures to satisfy flutter requirements

    BHATIA, K. G. / RUDISILL, C. S. | AIAA | 1971


    Optimization of complex structures to satisfy flutter requirements

    Bhatia, K. G. / Rudisill, C. S. | NTRS | 1971