Traction on winter surfaces was measured using three test vehicles, each designed to measure traction for a different purpose: vehicle mobility research (CRREL Instrumented Vehicle), commercial tire testing (Uniroyal-Goodrich traction tester), and airport runway safety (Saab friction tester). The traction measured with each method is comparable, but there are systematic differences due to the effects of the surface material and the test and analysis technique. This comparison serves as the fundamental basis for collaboration between the various traction testing communities and illustrates the need for well documented test procedures and data analysis as a standard for traction testing and evaluation. Mobility, Soil, Tires, Vehicle, Runway, Strength, Traction, Wheel, Snow, Terrain, Trafficability.
Three Approaches to Winter Traction Testing
1993
22 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Road Transportation , Air Transportation , Civil Engineering , Highway Engineering , Runways , Traction , Test vehicles , Comparison , Friction , Mobility , Safety , Snow , Surfaces , Terrain , Test and evaluation , Tires , Trafficability , Wheels , Winter , Surface analysis , Road tests , Factor analysis , Pavements , Tire-road interface
Three approaches to winter traction testing using instrumented vehicles
Kraftfahrwesen | 1994
|Three Approaches to Winter Traction Testing Using Instrumented Vehicles
SAE Technical Papers | 1994
|Online Contents | 1994
Kraftfahrwesen | 1994
|Winter Traction Testing Using Three Different Instrumented Vehicles
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
|