The Interval Management for Near-term Operations Validation of Acceptability (IM-NOVA) experiment was conducted at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Langley Research Center (LaRC) in support of the NASA Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Airspace Systems Program’s Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration - 1 (ATD-1). ATD-1 is intended to showcase an integrated set of technologies that provide an efficient arrival solution for managing aircraft using NextGen surveillance, navigation, procedures, and automation for both airborne and ground-based systems. The goal of the IM-NOVA experiment was to assess if procedures outlined by the ATD-1 Concept of Operations, when used with a minimum set of Flight deck-based Interval Management (FIM) equipment and a prototype crew interface, were acceptable to and feasible for use by flight crews in a voice communications environment. To investigate an integrated arrival solution using ground-based air traffic control tools and aircraft automatic dependent surveillance broadcast (ADS-B) tools, the LaRC FIM system and the Traffic Management Advisor with Terminal Metering and Controller Managed Spacing tools developed at the NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) were integrated in LaRC’s Air Traffic Operations Laboratory. Data were collected from 10 crews of current, qualified 757/767 pilots asked to fly a high-fidelity, fixed based simulator during scenarios conducted within an airspace environment modeled on the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Terminal Radar Approach Control area. The aircraft simulator was equipped with the Airborne Spacing for Terminal Area Routes algorithm and a FIM crew interface consisting of electronic flight bags and ADS-B guidance displays. Researchers used “pseudo-pilot” stations to control 24 simulated aircraft that provided multiple air traffic flows into DFW, and recently retired DFW air traffic controllers served as confederate Center, Feeder, Final, and Tower controllers. Pilot participant feedback indicated that the procedures used by flight crews to receive and execute interval management (IM) clearances in a voice communications environment were logical, easy to follow, did not contain any missing or extraneous steps, and required the use of an acceptable level of workload. The majority of the pilot participants found the IM concept, in addition to the proposed FIM crew procedures, to be acceptable and indicated that the ATD-1 procedures can be successfully executed in a near-term NextGen environment.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Acceptability of Flight Deck-Based Interval Management Crew Procedures


    Beteiligte:
    J. L. Murdoch (Autor:in) / S. R. Wilson (Autor:in) / C. E. Hubbs (Autor:in) / J. W. Smail (Autor:in)

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2014


    Format / Umfang :

    11 pages


    Medientyp :

    Report


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Acceptability of Flight Deck-Based Interval Management Crew Procedures

    Murdock, Jennifer L. / Wilson, Sara R. / Hubbs, Clay E. et al. | NTRS | 2013


    Acceptability of Flight Deck-Based Interval Management Crew Procedures

    Murdoch, J. / Wilson, Sara R. / Hubbs, Clay et al. | AIAA | 2013


    Acceptability of Flight Deck-Based Interval Management Crew Procedures (AIAA 2013-5155)

    Murdoch, J. / Wilson, S.R. / Hubbs, C. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013


    Evaluation of Flight Deck-Based Interval Management Crew Procedure Feasibility

    Wilson, Sara R. / Murdoch, J. / Hubbs, Clay et al. | AIAA | 2013


    Evaluation of Flight Deck-Based Interval Management Crew Procedure Feasibility

    Wilson, Sara R. / Murdoch, Jennifer L. / Hubbs, Clay E. et al. | NTRS | 2013