Some Members of Congress, particularly on the House Armed Services Committee, have expressed interest in expanding the use of nuclear power to a wider array of Navy surface ships, starting with the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser, the first of which the Navy wants to procure in FY2011. Section 1012 of the FY2008 Defense Authorization Act makes it U.S. policy to construct the major combatant ships of the Navy, including the CG(X), with integrated nuclear power systems, unless the Secretary of Defense submits a notification to Congress that the inclusion of an integrated nuclear power system in a given class of ship is not in the national interest. The Navy has studied nuclear power as a design option for the CG(X), but has not yet announced whether it would prefer to build the CG(X) as a nuclear-powered ship. Procurement of a nuclear-powered CG(X) in FY2011 would, under normal budgeting practices, involve funding the ship's long lead time nuclear-propulsion components in FY2009. A 2006 Navy study concluded the following: (1) In constant FY2007 dollars, building a Navy surface combatant with nuclear power rather than conventional power would add roughly $600-$800 million to its procurement cost; (2) The total life-cycle cost of a nuclear-powered medium-size surface combatant would equal that of a conventionally powered medium-size surface combatant if the cost of crude oil averages $70-$225 per barrel over the life of the ship; (3) Nuclear power should be considered for near-term applications for medium-size surface combatants; and (4) Compared to conventionally powered ships, nuclear-powered ships have advantages in terms of both time needed to surge to a distant theater of operation for a contingency, and in terms of time on station in the theater of operation. Regarding this issue, Congress needs to consider cost, operational effectiveness, ship construction, ship maintenance and repair, crew training, ports calls and forward homeporting, and environmental impact.
Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress. (2008)
2008
31 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Business & Economics , Marine Engineering , Logistics Military Facilities & Supplies , Nuclear Propulsion , Cruisers , Nuclear powered ships , Life cycle costs , Naval procurement , Naval vessels(Combatant) , Naval budgets , Naval training , Shipyards , Legislation , Shipbuilding , Ship personnel , Environmental impact , Marine nuclear propulsion , Maintenance , Operational effectiveness , Crew training , Ports call , Forward homeporting , Cg(X) class vessels