This paper argues that the current liability regimes for damage caused by conventional vehicles continue to apply to damages caused by automated vehicles, and therefore there is no need for a new legal regime, contrary to the claims of other authors. Theories that seek to hold manufacturers and programmers liable for that damage, are also rejected, as is the debate on the morality of automated vehicles, as the author argues that the operator of the automated vehicle remains liable as a conventional driver, even if he does not drive in a conventional sense.
Why Europe does not need revolutionary rules for automated vehicles
18.11.2020
217006 byte
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Does Europe Need a Space Revolution?
Springer Verlag | 2023
|Aerodynamics for Revolutionary Air Vehicles
NTIS | 2003
|Aerodynamics for Revolutionary Air Vehicles
AIAA | 2003
|Aerodynamics for Revolutionary Air Vehicles
NTRS | 2003
|Revolutionary Developments in Wheeled Military Vehicles
SAE Technical Papers | 1949
|