This paper uses eight evaluation metrics to compare and contrast three coordination schemes for a system that continuously plans to control collections of rovers (or spacecraft) using collective mission goals instead of goals or command sequences for each spacecraft. These schemes use a central coordinator to either (1) micromanage rovers one activity at a time, (2) assign mission goals to rovers, or (3) arbitrate mission goal auctions among rovers. A self-commanding collection of rovers would autonomously coordinate itself to satisfy high-level science and engineering goals in a changing partially understood environment-making the operation of tens or even a hundred spacecraft feasible.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Coordinated continual planning methods for cooperating rovers


    Beteiligte:
    Barrett, A. (Autor:in) / Rabideau, G. (Autor:in) / Estlin, T. (Autor:in) / Chien, S. (Autor:in)


    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2001-01-01


    Format / Umfang :

    939372 byte




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch



    Coordinated continual planning methods for cooperating rovers

    Barrett, A. / Rabideau, G. / Estlin, T. et al. | NTRS | 2000



    Coordinated Continual Planning Methods for Cooperating Rovers

    Barrett, A. / Rabideau, G. / Estlin, T. et al. | IEEE | 2007


    A comparison of coordinated planning methods for cooperating rovers

    Rabideau, Gregg / Estlin, Tara / Chien, Steve et al. | AIAA | 1999


    A Comparison of Cordinated Planning Methods for Cooperating Rovers

    Rabideau, G. / Estlin, T. / Chein, S. et al. | NTRS | 1999