WE concluded Part II of this series with the remark that a different outlook is needed for problems of control surface flutter than for those of wing flutter. There are two reasons for this. Wing flutter must be investigated carefully early on in the design of an aircraft so as to provide a safe aircraft without a severe weight penalty, whereas the weight penalty of avoiding control surface flutter is usually small, although not negligible, and modifications can often be made at short notice, so it is important to make a full investigation as late as possible before flight when all the data are available in a reliable form. The second reason is that with wing flutter, as with aileron reversal and divergence, it is usual to think of safety margins in terms of forward speed or possibly wing torsional stiffness; with control surface flutter, on the other hand, quite different types of safety factor become the rule.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    The Elementary Theory of Aero-Elasticity


    Untertitel :

    A Series of Articles Written from the Standpoint of a Structural Engineer for Students and Junior Members of Aircraft Design Teams


    Beteiligte:

    Erschienen in:

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    1954-05-01


    Format / Umfang :

    9 pages




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch



    Elementary theory of aero-elasticity

    Broadbent, E.G. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1954


    The Elementary Theory of Aero-Elasticity

    Broadbent , E.G. MA | Emerald Group Publishing | 1954


    The Elementary Theory of Aero-Elasticity

    Broad bent, E.G. | Emerald Group Publishing | 1954


    The Elementary Theory of Aero-Elasticity

    Broadbent, E.G. | Emerald Group Publishing | 1954


    Aero-Propulso-Servo-Elasticity

    G. Kopasakis | NTIS | 2011