AbstractThe word “exploration” threads its way through every discussion of human space flight and often headlines national policy statements about the US space agency. Yet this concept, so rooted in our culture, remains remarkably ill-defined. In this paper, we examine various presumptions implicit in the term and its ramifications for federally supported space endeavors. We argue that historical examples of exploration, widely used by policy makers, often make poor models for contemporary space travel. In particular, historical precedents of exploration set up a land-biased view of discovery, a restriction which impedes full expression of the Vision for Space Exploration and its possible scientific returns. These same precedents also set up a view of discovery that is biased toward in situ human presence, a view that modern technology is rendering increasingly absurd.
Visions of exploration
Space Policy ; 25 , 4 ; 236-243
2009-01-01
8 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Online Contents | 2009
|Global visions for space exploration education
Elsevier | 2009
|Future Visions for Scientific Human Exploration
NTRS | 2005
|Global visions for space exploration education
Online Contents | 2010
|Future Visions for Scientific Human Exploration
NTIS | 2005
|