Abstract The environmental and economic assessment of neighborhood-scale transit-oriented urban form changes should include initial construction impacts through long-term use to fully understand the benefits and costs of smart growth policies. The long-term impacts of moving people closer to transit require the coupling of behavioral forecasting with environmental assessment. Using new light rail and bus rapid transit in Los Angeles, California as a case study, a life-cycle environmental and economic assessment is developed to assess the potential range of impacts resulting from mixed-use infill development. An integrated transportation and land use life-cycle assessment framework is developed to estimate energy consumption, air emissions, and economic (public, developer, and user) costs. Residential and commercial buildings, automobile travel, and transit operation changes are included and a 60-year forecast is developed that compares transit-oriented growth against growth in areas without close access to high-capacity transit service. The results show that commercial developments create the greatest potential for impact reductions followed by residential commute shifts to transit, both of which may be effected by access to high-capacity transit, reduced parking requirements, and developer incentives. Greenhouse gas emission reductions up to 470Gg CO2-equivalents per year can be achieved with potential costs savings for TOD users. The potential for respiratory impacts (PM10-equivalents) and smog formation can be reduced by 28–35%. The shift from business-as-usual growth to transit-oriented development can decrease user costs by $3100 per household per year over the building lifetime, despite higher rental costs within the mixed-use development.
Highlights Develop an integrated transportation and land use life-cycle assessment framework. Transit-oriented growth in Los Angeles can reduce environmental impacts. Higher-density neighborhoods enable long-run environmental and economic benefits. Air emissions and household costs can be reduced by developing near transit. TOD users can save up to $3100 per year while reducing their environmental impact.
Transit-oriented smart growth can reduce life-cycle environmental impacts and household costs in Los Angeles
Transport Policy ; 35 ; 21-30
2014-01-01
10 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Transit-Oriented Development and Household Transportation Costs
Transportation Research Record | 2013
|Transit-Oriented Development and Household Transportation Costs: Household-Level Analysis
Online Contents | 2013
|Rapid Transit - Assessing grooved rail life-cycle costs
Online Contents | 2003
Applying Advanced Technology to Reduce Life-Cycle Costs
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|