Highlights Governance regimes for major transport investments in Sweden and Norway are studied. In Norway, the Ministry of Finance imposes external quality assurance requirements. Sweden has no corresponding ministerial oversight. More formalized process in Norway, but cost-benefit have more weight in Sweden. Neither country has introduced a formalized ex post evaluation process.

    Abstract The two Nordic countries Norway and Sweden have launched governance regimes for the early phases of transport infrastructure investments after experiencing frequent cost overruns and low cost-benefit ratios. This study seeks to find out if these governance regimes have reduced the escalation of costs from early estimates to finalized projects and influenced the choice of projects away from those with lower benefit to cost ratios. We have compared governance regimes for major transport infrastructure investments in the two countries and examined the development and content of quality assurance activities, the involvement of internal and external parties, their duties and responsibilities, their stage gate models, and how decisions are made. The findings are that both countries have introduced formalizations of their governance regimes that mandate project reviews during the planning process and quality assurance, both of which have increased early cost estimates. One difference was that in Norway, the Ministry of Finance manages the quality assurance scheme and imposes external quality assurance requirements, while Sweden has no corresponding ministerial oversight. Therefore, on the one hand, the process is more strictly formalized in Norway, but on the other hand, cost-benefit ratios appear to have more weight in Sweden. Furthermore, although both countries have done several ex post evaluations, neither country has introduced a formalized ex post evaluation process allowing for systematic examination of the causes of cost overruns and low benefit to cost ratios. Even so, politicians may manoeuvre projects with lower benefit to cost ratios around the governance systems in both countries. Finally, some projects in both countries still have experienced significant cost escalations despite these processes.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Governance regimes for large transport infrastructure investment projects: Comparative analysis of Norway and Sweden


    Beteiligte:
    Olsson, Nils O.E. (Autor:in) / Nyström, Johan (Autor:in) / Pyddoke, Roger (Autor:in)

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2019-07-22


    Format / Umfang :

    12 pages




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Norway and Sweden

    River, J. | Tema Archiv | 1990




    Assessing Economic Impacts of Large-Scale Transport Infrastructure Projects

    Schade, Wolfgang | Transportation Research Record | 2006


    Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects

    Broniewicz, Elzbieta / Ogrodnik, Karolina | Elsevier | 2020