AbstractThis study evaluates individual preferences for five different cycling environments by trading off a better facility with a higher travel time against a less attractive facility at a lower travel time. The tradeoff of travel time to amenities of a particular facility informs our understanding of the value attached to different attributes such as bike-lanes, off-road trails, or side-street parking. The facilities considered here are off-road facilities, in-traffic facilities with bike-lane and no on-street parking, in-traffic facilities with a bike-lane and on-street parking, in-traffic facilities with no bike-lane and no on-street parking and in-traffic facilities with no bike-lane but with parking on the side. We find that respondents are willing to travel up to twenty minutes more to switch from an unmarked on-road facility with side parking to an off-road bicycle trail, with smaller changes associated with less dramatic improvements.
Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice ; 41 , 4 ; 287-301
2006-09-12
15 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey
Online Contents | 2007
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|Managed-Lanes Stated Preference Survey in Atlanta, Georgia
Transportation Research Record | 2008
|Valuing Accidents Using Stated Preference Methods
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
|An innovative stated preference computer survey model for valuing noise impacts from road traffic
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
|