AbstractChanges in ridership at individual stations on Chicago's mass-transit rail system following fare increases in 2004, 2006, 2009 and 2013 are analyzed to determine whether the ridership response varies with the per capita income in the neighborhood surrounding each station. We find mixed results. For one of the four fare changes the decline in ridership is greater in lower-income neighborhoods than it is in higher-income neighborhoods. However, the reverse is found for another fare increase. For two of the increases there is no relationship between income and ridership response. These mixed findings are in line with the prior literature that also found an inconsistent relationship. We hypothesize that there are two competing forces at work. On one hand lower-income groups are more constrained in their budget, but on the other hand they have fewer options for switching to other modes.
HighlightsInvestigates if fare responsiveness varies with the income of a neighborhood.Data from four fare increases on mass-transit rail in Chicago.Finds mixed results.Lower income riders may have a tighter budget constraint but fewer alternatives.
Does the demand response to transit fare increases vary by income?
Transport Policy ; 55 ; 79-86
2017-01-27
8 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Does the demand response to transit fare increases vary by income?
Online Contents | 2017
|Does fare-free transit increase labor-force participation and reduce income inequality?
DOAJ | 2024
|Comparison of Reduced-Fare Programs for Low-Income Transit Riders
Transportation Research Record | 2021
|Optimal Fare Structure for Transit Networks with Elastic Demand
Transportation Research Record | 2000
|Optimal Fare Structure for Transit Networks with Elastic Demand
Online Contents | 2000
|