Highlights The outcome is a network of three break-bulk terminals. Consolidation facilities could benefit a fragmented freight industry very much. The intervention of the public sector as investor proves necessary. Logistic facilities can attract also private capitals. The design process adds a new terminal if demand rises by 30%.
Abstract This paper deals with the design of logistic terminals taking Sicily, in the South of Italy, as a case study. It focuses on consolidation terminals for truckers and addresses the problem of optimising location pattern and public share in investments. This problem is solved through a Stackelberg game between the designer and the collective of road carriers. So a bilevel approach combines a system-optimum problem, at the upper level, with the carrier equilibrium problem, at the lower level. The choice behaviour of the lower-level player is simulated by a random utility model. The output of the game suggests that private companies and society should share the investments and the public contribution should be high; furthermore, transhipment and consolidation services should be concentrated at few terminals to exploit fully economies of scale at the expense of the average travel time to reach the logistic platforms.
A Stackelberg-game approach to support the design of logistic terminals
Journal of Transport Geography ; 41 ; 63-73
2014-01-01
11 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
A Stackelberg-game approach to support the design of logistic terminals
Online Contents | 2014
|Spatial Evaluation Approach in the Planning Process of Transport Logistic Terminals
DOAJ | 2006
|